AI Won't Replace Coding - Coders with AI Will
Nov 3, 2025
8 min
Every few months, the headlines warn that artificial intelligence is “coming for coding.” The message is usually sensational: AI will soon make software developers obsolete. But as 2025 draws to a close, reality tells a more grounded story. At Coder’s Clubhouse, we believe AI won’t replace coders — coders who learn to harness AI will replace those who don’t.
Hype vs. Reality
There’s no doubt that AI tools have transformed how we write code. GitHub Copilot, OpenAI’s GPT-5, and Anthropic’s Claude 3.5 can now generate useful functions and debug snippets in seconds. Productivity has improved — but not in the way many predicted.
A Stanford University working paper found that entry-level software roles in AI-exposed fields dropped by roughly 13 percent since 2022, while senior roles grew, because experienced coders possess “tacit knowledge … that may never be written down anywhere.” (CBS News, 2025)
At the same time, some companies are using AI as a convenient justification for layoffs. Amazon’s CEO Andy Jassy admitted that efficiency gains from AI will “reduce our total corporate workforce.” (NY Post, 2025) But insiders note that the technology often masks traditional cost-cutting. As one engineer put it: “No programmer has lost their job due to AI … companies lay off people and tell the rest they’ll be more productive now because of AI.” (Reddit, 2025)
Even leading AI firms acknowledge that the human coder is still essential. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei recently said, “Ninety percent of our code is written by our AI model … but you still need just as many software engineers. You might need more.” (Business Insider, 2025)
From My Perspective: The Work Is Changing, Not Disappearing
Having spent years working for Microsoft and later at a billion-dollar AI company, I’ve seen this transformation up close. AI isn’t eliminating developer jobs — it’s creating new kinds of developer jobs.
At both organizations, I saw software teams grow, not shrink, because of AI. They’re building products differently than they were even two or three years ago. They’re designing features that integrate AI capabilities, using AI to handle repetitive or boilerplate tasks, and spending more of their time on architecture, logic, and creativity.
AI has become the new “junior engineer” on the team — incredibly fast at cranking out code but still in need of human review, direction, and judgment. And that shift requires developers to evolve, not retreat.
Why Coder's Won't Disappear - They'll Evolve
AI can generate code, but it can’t yet understand why something should be built or how to make trade-offs around performance, security, or usability. A 2025 study found that AI-assisted teams produced more lines of code but required 6.5 percent more review time and saw a 19 percent drop in original contributions. (arXiv, 2025)
That means AI helps with the easy parts but increases the need for thoughtful human oversight — just as calculators didn’t eliminate math, and spreadsheets didn’t eliminate accountants.
History Repeats Itself
Consider the world of print and book publishing. Once the craft of typesetting, manual layout, and physical printing dominated. Then digital publishing, desktop tools, and the internet transformed the process. Yet, publishing didn’t die — it evolved.
Editors became content strategists. Designers became digital creators. Production managers became workflow engineers. The essence of the work remained; the tools simply changed. As one industry analysis put it:
“Technology has been transforming the publishing industry for decades … The industry has often adapted to change.”
(Morressier, 2025)
Software development is experiencing the same shift. The nature of the job is changing, not disappearing.
What This Means for Young Coders
At Coder’s Clubhouse, we teach kids that AI is a tool, not a replacement. Knowing how to use it responsibly is now as vital as understanding loops or conditionals. Coders who learn to collaborate with AI — to prompt it well, to check its work, to integrate its ideas — will have a major advantage in tomorrow’s workforce.
That’s why, in our latter Path Program levels, we go beyond just teaching coding — we teach how to code with AI.
In our Master Level, students use AI copilots as real-world coding partners. They inherit existing projects in Python, C#, and HTML/CSS, using AI to analyze unfamiliar code, find and fix bugs, and brainstorm ways to extend programs with new features. But they also learn to question and validate AI’s suggestions — developing the critical thinking, creativity, and judgment that no algorithm can replicate.
In our Grandmaster Level, students take the leap from using AI to building it. They create their own AI product — an intelligent, voice-powered bot called Voices of History that blends Python, microcontrollers, and GPT-powered reasoning to bring historical figures to life. Students wire LEDs and sensors, write Python code that connects to real AI APIs, and even design and 3D-print their own enclosures.
By the end, they’ve learned how to engineer an AI-powered product from concept to creation — combining software, hardware, and imagination. It’s hands-on, forward-thinking education that mirrors the modern tech industry itself.
Conclusion
The promise of AI in software development is real: faster iteration, smarter features, and greater productivity. But the myth of total replacement is fading fast. What we’re seeing in late 2025 is a reshaping of the coder’s role — not its extinction.
AI won’t replace coders. Coders with AI will.
Share This:
Sign up for our newsletter!
Join the Founder's Club — Save big!
Path & Makerspace: first month billed today; billing resumes at opening at Founder rates. Focus Classes: pay per 8-week class with 15% off.